Shock News!!!! Benghazi Attackers May Have Been Armed By The US!!!!!!!!


Well, we all knew this, already.  But, it bears repeating.  And, there’s an interesting observation from the source of the story ……


The Obama administration may have provided the weapons used by some Islamist extremists to kill four Americans at the United States’ compound in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, according to a Libyan source who told Breitbart News he witnessed the attack first hand.

Breitbart News’s Tera Dahl spoke to the witness, whose identity cannot be revealed due to threats against his life, but lives near the former U.S. compound in Benghazi and was present when the attack took place.

Libya’s al-Qaeda-linked militia group known as the February 17th Martyrs Brigade was reportedly hired by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department to provide security at the Benghazi compound, but failed to so the whole day of the attack, according to the witness.

It was unusual that in the morning of September 11, the brigade was not providing the typical level of security around the U.S. consulate and the ambassador himself, a sign that something was off from the start and a major red flag that there was something suspicious in the works, he added.

Terrorists carried out at least three separate attacks against the Benghazi compound, starting at night on September 11 and carrying into the wee hours of the following day.

Those extremists may be the same ones who were allegedly armed by the Obama administration during the U.S. and NATO-backed uprising against Muammar Gaddafi, who was overthrown and executed in October 2011. Libya has been in a state of chaos since, with jihadist groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) filling a power and security vacuum left by the dissolution of the government.

It was evident from the beginning of the first attack on that fateful September night in 2012 that it was not a protest, the witness told Breitbart News.

About 40 armed extremists, most likely affiliated with al-Qaeda, approached the embassy, he added.

He noted that four or more Americans were evacuated from the compound, “minutes before the first attack,” because they saw the “extremists” coming towards them.

The witness sounded extremely surprised to hear that Amb. Stevens was left behind.

“I didn’t think there was an American left in the embassy,” he said, adding, “I didn’t think for a second that the ambassador was still inside.”

“Sometimes it feels like a cheesy, cheap movie…something like the United States intended for the ambassador to die,” added the Benghazi resident. “They sacrificed him as a scapegoat.”

Consistent with secret intelligence reports obtained by The Washington Times early this year, the Libyan witness said the Obama administration armed Islamist extremists and rebels in 2011 as then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was trying to overthrow Gaddafi.

The United States government and Congress, including

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) , was then-working with Islamist extremists and rebels, including the February 17th Brigade, and “even gave them weapons.”

“Libyan officials were deeply concerned in 2011, as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was trying to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power, that weapons were being funneled to NATO-backed rebels with ties to al Qaeda, fearing that well-armed insurgents could create a safe haven for terrorists,” the reports obtained by The Washington Timesrevealed.

Top senior Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat lawmaker distrusted Secretary Clinton’s push for military intervention in Libya so much that they decided to meet with Gaddafi-regime officials themselves.

“In the documents and separately recorded conversations with U.S. emissaries, Libyan officials expressed particular concern that the weapons and training given the rebels would spread throughout the region, in particular turning the city of Benghazi into a future terrorist haven,” noted The Washington Times.

It continued, “Those fears would be realized a little over a year later when a band of jihadist insurgents attacked the State Department diplomatic post in Benghazi and a related CIA compound, killing four Americans…”

According to the witness who spoke to Breitbart News, it was a poorly-kept secret among locals  that the U.S. was working with the extremists to take down the Libyan strongman.

“The U.S. thought Gaddafi was a greater threat than the extremists,” he said.

The attacks would eventually result in the deaths of four Americans. U.S. Amb. J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty were killed in the attack. …..

Read more at the link.

That we probably armed the lunatics isn’t a surprise to anyone.  It’s been alleged that’s what the CIA people were up to ….. trying to buy back the weapons we gave the lunatics. 

Of course, many people haven’t made the connection that the US and NATO, and all of the other idiots involved in the regime toppling in the Mid-East has created the ISIS mess.  Now, whether or not it was intentional, rather than purposely planned could be, I suppose, debatable.  But, in my mind, it isn’t.  Look at what we tried to do in Egypt.  Does anyone pretend that it was accidental that we backed and supported a MB lunatic?  When we toppled Gaddafi, we knew there would be a power vacuum.   We ensured total chaos when we armed radical Muslim lunatics.  We did the exact same thing in our effort to topple Assad.  Indeed, some of the weapons now possessed by ISIS came from the buy back program in Libya.  Of course, all of that is entirely against international law and probably US law. 

Now, given the above paragraph, it would occur to even the most dull of people that we’re toppling the wrong nations in the Mid-East and North Africa.  Kuwait, Saudi, and Iran are the major exporters of terrorist lunatics.  Libya, Egypt and Syria are not and did a fair job of keeping the lunatics in check.  We arm their rebels, and back people friendly towards the lunatics.  This is intentional and systematic.  And novel to the Obama administration.  While Bush did topple Hussain, he did it with our own and allied troops and remained in the area to ensure the lunatics didn’t take over.  What’s happening in the Obama administration is the opposite.  Again, what team Obama is doing is systematic, and thus, intentional.    

This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Shock News!!!! Benghazi Attackers May Have Been Armed By The US!!!!!!!!

  1. Latitude says:

    who needs horror movies

  2. Latitude says:

    Just for fun…All the stations down here have been in defcon 1 weather porn….
    State of Florida declairs an emergency…..I get my first FPL severe weather warning email….
    ..and five seconds later….Erika goes poof!

    these things a good for business….
    Walmart Coral Springs…..not a native within 100 miles

    • suyts says:

      LOL!!!! Yep! It’s fascinating. We used to never get coverage of tropical storms, now, it’s like they pray that it becomes a hurricane. Floridians must think this is funnier than anything!

      A storms coming!!!!! State of Emergency!!!!!! ……oh, well.

  3. leftinflagstaff says:

    Kinda weird that I lived 35 yrs in FL….didn’t experience a direct impact til Sandy in Brookyln.

  4. gator69 says:

    This is news?

  5. Latitude says:

    why are they called “intelligence” when they’re so stupid…

    worried about collateral damage…when it’s collateral because they are safe havens because we’re not bombing them

    Pentagon Not Targeting Islamic State Training Camps

  6. Jason Calley says:

    Suppose you ran an extremely (oh, and I do mean EXTREMELY!) profitable termite control business and discovered a way to do a one-time treatment that would prevent every building in town from ever having a termite problem again. Would you do it? Yes? Really?

    Suppose you ran an extremely (oh, and I do mean EXTREMELY!) profitable national protection apparatus and discovered that you had the military, intelligence and logistics capability to ensure that no major enemies would be capable of seriously endangering your nation again. Would you do it? Yes? Really?

    We have all heard of the fireman who is a secret arson, or of the glazier who secretly breaks windows. Of course YOU wouldn’t do such a thing, and I would never do such a thing. We are too honest — but what about the head of the DEA? What about the upper managers of the ATF or the IRS? What about Obama? Really?

    • DirkH says:

      That’s not the reason.
      Libya was destroyed to steal Gaddafhis Gold. Then the terrorists were moved, probably by C130’s, to Syria, to repeat the process there. (and build a gas pipeline from Qatar).
      (and the weapons were moved. That ambassador had to be killed because he was about to spill the beans)
      Ukraine was acquired to steal their Gold.

      The terrorists are now being moved to Germany via the US-controlled immigration flood, – how do I know it is US controlled? SIMPLE: It started EXACTLY when the USA started the Ukraine Putsch/war. NOT after Libya was destroyed! NOT after the destruction of Syria!

      So, in that flood all the terrorists are moved to Germany. What does Germany have?
      4000 tons of GOLD!

      The bankrupt USA is on a series of huge bank heists and is now so desperate they destroy their own “allies” (a.k.a. vassals).

      • Jason Calley says:

        Hey DirkH! I always enjoy your comments, and probably agree with most of them. You may very well be correct on this one as well. I would point out that my comment was only meant as a generalized statement of concept; a lot of people (not you nor me!) still have problems in wrapping their mind around the whole concept that Our Glorious Public Servants would actively plan and finance the very terrorists and boogymen that they claim are threatening us.It never hurts to restate that false flags are more common than the average person thinks.

        As for the serial gold-heists that is a very plausible idea. I would doubt that stealing gold is THE reason for US actions. “One reason of many” is probably a better description. The ongoing immigration flood in Europe and in the US is such a glaring contradiction to the supposed War On Terror that I do not understand how the average unthinking person can see them both without a cranial explosion. We are told that the world is breeding more and more and more dangerous terrorists, men who will stop at nothing to murder the freedom loving people of the world if only they are allowed half a chance — and simultaneously we are being told that essentially anyone on the planet may move to our respective nations with no papers, no border checks, no education, no vaccinations, no legal restraints and no job… and then be eligible for more benefits than a legal citizen may receive! WHAT?!! WHAT?!! In some places they are even being given the right to vote! MADNESS!!

        As much as I would love to blame the so-called “Progressives” the fact is that every Republican and every Democrat President since Reagan has allowed this to continue, each to a larger degree than his predecessor.

        MADNESS!! The West is committing suicide.

        • DirkH says:

          ” “One reason of many” is probably a better description. ”

          Yes. They choose those paths of action that deliver a multiple punch. A simple selection of possible plans; a decision matrix.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s