More Proof Of Our Civilization’s Impending Doom!!!!!

University Students Are Unable to Read a Whole Book


It’s over folks.  We’re done.  Doomed.  Fine.

University students are increasingly unable to read a whole book as they simply don’t have the concentration spans required, nor are they able to understand complex, nuanced arguments, academics have said.

Lecturers at leading British universities are having to actively encourage students to read beyond the set texts, and have noticed that students are increasingly unwilling to read whole texts. They say they believe internet culture is to blame, as young people nowadays are used to receiving arguments in the form of 800-1000 word articles. Anything beyond that, they say, is now proving too challenging.

“Incoming undergraduates have had their attention habits fashioned in a totally different world than that of those who are teaching them,” Tamson Pietsch, fellow in history at the University of Sydney told Times Higher Education (THE).

“This can lead to a clash of expectations and also of abilities on both sides of the equation. In many ways, incoming students absorb information quickly, they understand the power of images, and are adept at moving between different types of sources and platforms. They are perhaps less used to concentrating for long periods of time and working through the nuances of an argument developed over the course of many pages.”

Jenny Pickerill, professor in environmental geography at the University of Sheffield, said of full length books: “students struggle with them, saying the language or concepts are too hard.

“I recently had a student suggest an alternative book for a module I am teaching which they found easier to engage with. It was a good book, but it was not really academic enough and I am still unsure if that matters or whether I should be recommending more readable books.

“There is currently a disjuncture between the types of reading we want students to engage with and the types students feel able or willing to do.”

Jo Brewis, professor of organisation and consumption at the University of Leicester says she would like to see students reading more as “it would enable them to make more considered arguments in their coursework or examinations, and to demonstrate to us as assessors that they have considered the debates and controversies in the literature and arrived at reasoned conclusions on that basis”.

However, she concedes that, rather than pushing her students to fulfill those expectations, she accepts that “recommending whole books would be rather daunting” for them and therefore tends not to do it.

Indeed, her confession suggests that internet culture may not be totally to blame; it seems that students may be being let down by the poor expectations of teachers and lecturers themselves.

Now, because I don’t like to quote entire articles, I would stop here and encourage the reader to read the rest, but, there are some stunning revelations afterward ……

Staff at the THE have suggested that sixth form teachers ought to hand their students a recommended reading list for the summer before university as a way to ease students in to the rigours of reading long texts, and they asked a number of academics for suggested titles.

Kenneth Grahame’s whimsical children’s tale The Wind in the Willows (1908) was among the books suggested, as were liberal and feminist titles such as Danielle Allen’s Talking to Strangers (“it speaks directly to the current refugee crisis in Europe and failures to recognise the claims of others,” said its nominator), and Marilyn French’s The Women’s Room (1977).

More modern titles included Owen Jones’s The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It (2014) and Naomi Klein’s This Changes Everything: Capitalism v’s The Climate (2014).

Balzac’s Old Goriot (1835) and Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations (1953) also made the list, but were dismissed as too challenging by Geoff Barton, head teacher a large comprehensive in Suffolk, who was asked to comment.

Balzac was deemed “utterly unreadable” by Barton, who prides himself on the school’s track record of getting students to university, while Wittgenstein was considered “woefully worthy”. To the latter he added: “Before university? Come off it.”

You see, even if the instructors are able to get the students to read a whole book, the selections they’ve accepted simply means the students would then have their small minds full of claptrap.  There’s no way to win in this scenario and teach the children something worthwhile and useful. 

Personally, I believe this is a result of universities simply accepting everyone to attend.  Thus, there are lower quality and lower intellect students, on average.  Rather than simply failing the students, the expectations and standards are lowered, providing a huge disservice to the students actually capable of learning and reading a whole book. 

But, this is where we’re at.  Don’t think for a second this is unique to the U.K.  It’s all over western civilization.  We’ve doomed ourselves. 

This entry was posted in Education. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to More Proof Of Our Civilization’s Impending Doom!!!!!

  1. DirkH says:

    Capitalism vs The Climate, that’s a good one. That tops even the crap *I* had to read in the 70ies and believe you me, I had some leftist morons as teachers. Without having read it, but I dared to watch Naomi Klein on youtube and boy oh boy is the woman a moron.

    Wait. You said *University*? oh. Oooooh.

  2. kim2ooo says:

    Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented:

  3. Latitude says:

    …same with our military

    but what are you going to do when those same schools allow this….Grades, Showing Up On Time Are A Form Of White Supremacy

    • suyts says:

      Yep ….. can’t be having being timely as a positive trait. Not only are they teaching our children to be stupid, they’re teaching them horrid ways of being.

    • Lars P. says:

      Lol, any student who shows up in time at that education class is… stupid.
      The right procedure is not to show up at all…
      According to her, this is bad: “Rugged individual, honest, hard-working, disciplined, rigorous, successful,”

      The truth is that persons like her would not get an educational job without a huge bureaucratic machine, where spewing such nonsense becomes the norm. In a way she may be right, as the bigger the bureaucracy the bigger the mess and the promotion of non-value.

      For the whitey supremacist theory, lets take a look for example for an east-european. They had generations of grief, if you look to the south-east, hundreds of years of ottoman empire domination – which is the model for isis btw. – finally free since 150-200 years, devastating world wars, a half of a century of communism, now finally relatively free, and then comes a twat and tells them they are white supremacists. You can imagine how these progressist fare in eastern europe. You cannot sell this guilt religion to the east.

  4. Lars P. says:

    More proof of impending doom?
    Here, the dinosaurs are back:

  5. kelly says:

    I agree I couldn’t be bothered reading the whole article James put up

  6. leftinflagstaff says:

    Dammit! I bet I would have aced Geometry today.

  7. DirkH says:

    State media of UK, the BBC, goes on defamation campaign against right wing twitter user, publishing personal details. The Total State is obviously rabid!

  8. DirkH says:

    Like so many other jews, the Grünfeld brothers, also known as Ben and Jerry, ice cream makers, think socialism is a splendid idea, get themselves arrested before capitol like a thousand other protesters.
    That should earn them the ice cream monopoly in the People’s Republic of North America. (PRONA) (formerly USA).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s