It’s more of a reminder, but if a plug for a fellow climate warrior comes with it? So much the better!
1100+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarm
“Wow, the list is pretty impressive …It’s Oreskes done right.“
– Luboš Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physics
“…it’s a very useful resource. Thanks to the pop tech team.“
– Joanne Nova, Author of The Skeptics Handbook
“I do confess a degree of fascination with Poptech’s list…“
– John Cook, Skeptical Science
† The list has been cited by Scientists (1, 2) and Professors (3)
WARNING: Do not accept any criticisms of this list without first reading the rebuttals or emailing, populartechnology (at) gmail (dot) com
I included that warning for the novice. This is a wonderful resource, but, needs to be used with understanding….. like anything else.
suyts space 
If you turn climate sceptic and post 1,100 journal articles on your website you too could win a coffee mug not paid for by Big Oil.
Well, heck, that’s just too many plugs too soon!! I saw the post but didn’t bother to see who.
I should say I heartily thank Poptech for providing a resource which is both invaluable and proof that the ‘climate change’ consensus is not unanimous, nor even scientifically supportable.
His writing about SkS and their interesting internal forum is the cherry on top.
LOL, no doubt! Those lunatics and their secret society club ….. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Nice resource for answering the alarmists that says “show me one single paper published by a scientist skeptical of CAGW!”
I’m bookmarking this page 😉
I posted it because I’d run into a couple of pinheads that seemed to believe these didn’t exist. Sometimes, it’s disheartening to go out and about. Same thread had a fellow tell us that Catrina like storms have increased 10 fold since the 1920s.
It shakes my belief in my fellow man.
CAGW is dead and some people seem to still buy into fake hockey sticks and bogus statistics rather than looking at the last 16 years of instrument record. Yes, it shakes my belief in my fellow man too.
>>
HankH says:
March 19, 2013 at 11:35 pm
. . . rather than looking at the last 16 years of instrument record.
<<
What’s interesting is that the instrumented temperature record has been manipulated to show warming, and it still shows a decrease. That’s why these charlatans tried to push the idea that models and proxies were more accurate than thermometers (or their equivalent).
Jim
It’s getting harder for them now because everybody is watching them now! Ya See!
It’s kinda like the internets that Al invented and the free education they all supported way back when and now think everybody is dumb enough to believe their Bull Shit without question, that is comming back to bite them in the arse!
Me, I think you nailed it. In the past, everyone simply believed the reported temps, but as more and more people were watching, suddenly the temps quit raising! Strange that.
Very true, Jim. There’s only so far you can adjust things before it becomes obvious even to the untrained eye that something’s out of whack. There’s too many different types of instrumental readings that adjusting too far raises suspicion. So now they have to find more crafty ways to adjust.
And when they control the internet like the LSM it’s done.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/temperate-facts/co2-and-gw-primers/peer-reviewed-studies
Yep, goes to the same place!
It was over 900 a couple years ago yet the warmist don’t like it. 😆
Right Coolwhip?
Yeh, I remember when it went over 1000!
gator knew about this too!
And I’m not sure but he may have mentioned it here.
I’ve mentioned it a few times here, mostly in the comments. I just wanted people to know it was there.
Yep saw it, knew it was there, saw the warmist complain about it, and thought it was old news, but the first place I saw it was CCD. Although it wasn’t called that back then. Give Thomas the kudos fer putting that together unless someone has done it before him that Me don’t know about.
And sorry if I said something that got you angry with Me! 😆
Hmm….. Me, go back to the link you offered….. , scroll down to where it says “continue reading…..” , click on it. It will take you to the source.
I’m piss poor on names, but, PopTech, I think, is the one who put that together. Thomas and CCD get all sorts of kudos from me, he’s fantastic! But, I think the list is PopTech’s.
I try hard to get attribution correct. So, if I’m wrong, please don’t hesitate to correct me.
You are right! Me apologies! 😆
Thomas credits poptech! 😆
No worries! And, you should know better than to think I would get angry over something like that.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/temperate-facts/co2-and-gw-primers/peer-reviewed-studies
Here is the link to support what you said! you are right and Me is wrong on this and Thomas gave full credit to Pop Tech here! 😆
Well the angry thing was over your uncle’s banjo and mandoline thing that you picked up.
Err I mean you bought at the auction. To be more clear? Me thinks! 😆
LOL, well, the mandolin is pissing me off, but the banjo is sounding sweet! Now all I’ve got to do is figure out how to play the durn things!
The mandoline should be easier, but I don’t know because I have never tried to play the banjo. But the mandoline has basic chords like the guitar and you can pick riffs.
Well I tried the banjo, but that was it didn’t now what to do with all the finger picks.:lol:
Me bro has tha knack, but I don’t.
Tip fer the mandoline use an extra light pick till you get used to it.
Thanks! And no doubt!
Also The Hockey Schtick blog puts up lots of good papers. I bookmark them when I see one which is interesting and useful for arguing with CAGW people. They are exceptional value for this. Well worth a visit. Tom Nelson often links to him.
Here’s the link.
Always good to remind us of the resource.
I remember when the alarmists used to constantly attack this list, and they always lost. Now they just seem to act like it does not exist, like the Oregon Petition.
Deniers!
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.