The NoTricksZone alerts us to this latest German revolt against the IPCC.
Online Spiegel as of right now has an unflattering report on the UN IPCC AR5 climate report as its top headline: www.spiegel.de/.
This hardly helps the credibility of climate scientists.
The headline article is dubbed: Contradictory Prognoses: Scientists Discover Discrepancies In UN Climate Report, written by Spiegel science journalist Axel Bojanowski.
The bold print introduction:
The UN warns in 2200 pages in its new climate report of a dramatic change in the environment. Renowned scientists now criticize the inconsistencies in the report. They aim 5 accusations at the IPCC.”
Read more at the top link above.
Now, the criticisms aren’t really new. What is new is the apparent new found resistance to the notion that the IPCC is the final word on our climate. Over the years, with very few exceptions, the German media has been squarely supportive of the global warming lunacy.
They do make the most obvious point. And, it is and was a glaring mistake for the IPCC not to address.
Even after revising their data for the 4th time (actually more than that because we’re on version 4. something now) They still can’t get the stubborn temps to rise. And, this has supposedly made the “scientists” 
even more convinced that man’s emissions are the cause of all of this imaginary warming. Think about that. The lack of warming over X amount of years, make them more certain that the warming is caused by human emissions.
The article also pokes fun at that notion that our oceans ate our homework warming. They point out that there is no measurements to confirm this. They’re simply too short in duration and distribution and incomplete.
How bad is it when some of the most ardent supporters are now questioning the conclusions of that political body?
Just for furtherance of thought, I’ll add this. We all know the alleged increase in the “joules” in the ocean, supposed by the alarmists doesn’t mean an equal increase in temperatures. Not in the oceans, not on the surface, and not in the atmosphere. But, then, we also have to ask ourselves the most obvious question, with the most obvious answer. Is the supposed increase in energy in the oceans always expressed by increased temperatures?
I ask this because it seems to me that the alarmists are trying to say that eventually that energy will work through the many systems of the earth and eventually be expressed as an increase in surface temps. We know this isn’t necessarily true. Do our oceans do work?
suyts space 
Der Spiegel has two honest and intelligent employees: Bojanowski for science and Fleischhauer, their token conservative.
For all the years, Bojanowski was never responsible for climate science – Der Spiegel was always catastrophist-warmist. Climate Change was clearly seen as a POLITICAL and not a scientific theme by Der Spiegel; and all the political articles are hacked together by stupid anonymous hivemind leftists and signed with “Spiegel-Mitarbeiter” (Spiegel employee).
This changed only last year or so when Bojanowski took over. Half of the time he gives warmist summaries of the official party declarations, half of the time he talks about the science which becomes, ahem, more uncertain.
So, the fact that they gave this theme to him means that it is NO MORE IMPORTANT TO THE CONTROLLING POWERS. Der Spiegel is the German NYT equivalent and as controlled a medium as can be.
They (CFR/Bilderbergers) have given up on warmism as a political bludgeon.
I think you’re exactly right. They’ve exploited all they can and are now walking away from it, in search of the next bedwetting issue to exploit and control people with.
Very informative analysis. That is the reason I look forward to comments from non-Americans.
You have to hand it to these IPCC guys for choosing ‘average’ as the issue. One, average is the best if not only way to make it look worse than it is though an math major could tell you that average is only one of the ways to look at a dataset.
Also, even the dumbest of an air wasting self serving hack like Al Gore can explain an average to the dumbest of a studies major or anyone plain ignorant about some basic math.
This presentation is a bit dated, but the solar radiation has decreased over the last 50 years and the pan evaporation rates have not all matched expectations of increased evaporation due to a temperature increase.
Click to access CIVE520_Class_PanParadox_new.pdf
Of the 44 annual pans, 64% show a decreasing ETpan trend. This is consistent with
trends observed elsewhere [e.g., Chattopadhyay and Hulme, 1997; Peterson et al.,
1995; Roderick and Farquhar, 2002]
Of the 12 pans with significant trends (at the 90% level using the F-statistic of the trend
slope), 75% are decreasing. Of the 228 warm-season pans, 60% show decreasing
ETpan; of the 43 pans with significant trends, 84% are decreasing. Warm-season ETpan
has decreased across most of the conterminous U.S.
The big scary number of the week is 15 × 1022 (or 150 million quadrillion). It’s the number of Joules the ocean has apparently heated by since 1961. But convert it to degrees per year and suddenly the big scary 15 × 1022 becomes three thousands of one degree per year. Unmeasurably small.
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/07/the-antidote-to-150-million-quadrillion-joules/
Exactly. And, the notion those lunatics measured the joules in the ocean in 60s is preposterous. Now they’re just making up crap they don’t even know what they’re making up.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.