Must Reads Regarding The Google Engineer’s Manifesto!!!!!


So, just to bring people up to date, there is a guy who was recently fired from Google.  The reason he was fired is because he sent out a memo.  Some have called it a “manifesto”, others have called it a “screed”. 

Now, the fact that Google is a home for leftards should not be a surprise for anyone who bothers to pay attention.  They are a group of leftards.  This is uncontroversial.  But, apparently, what the man wrote was, even though all he stated was well reasoned and well science established facts …… for the most part.  There are some finer points I’d like to hone in on regarding his memo, but, for now, I’ll just say this guy articulated the well known fact that there are physiological and psychological differences between the sexes! 

Here is the “memo”.  Here is the reaction from some experts in some of the fields he discussed in his “memo”.  It’s well worth the read!  However, the site may be experiencing some problems.  But, get there if you can.  ….. soon.  I have a feeling things might be being revised as we speak! 

This entry was posted in Economics, News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Must Reads Regarding The Google Engineer’s Manifesto!!!!!

  1. leftinflagstaff says:

    You would think he could grasp the realities of climate as well as he does with gender. Climate has been doing it’s thing much longer.

  2. Latitude says:

    I still can’t get the link to work…….phooey!

    • suyts says:

      The memo or the reaction?

      • Latitude says:

        Reaction…but it was timing….it opened early this morning

        I particularly liked the one that spells out sexual diversity…and how the libtards are making the argument against it….using their argument, there’s no discrimination in hiring an all male team

  3. Lars P. says:

    Both links work for me. Interesting read, opens a can of worms. The idea is to judge people by what they are as individuals and not as tribe – no quotas but merit.

    The diversity vice-president from the company wrote her response, where first of all informs the reader that she is new to the role. Who the hell cares? She does not bring anything constructive to the dialogue, just enforces policy.
    She does not seem to understand that without freedom of speech there is no diversity.

    • Latitude says:

      first….there’s nothing constructive to bring to the argument…the libtards are not trying to make an argument…
      second….they are lazy….it’s easier to claim that you are offended…no discussion needed

    • It’s Google. Their rejection of free speech is only immoral, not illegal. But as more and more of these people get elected, and that mindset slow creeps into our government, that’s when we’ll have to respond.

      • Latitude says:

        I can’t believe the majority of people are on board with this….and it looks like they are a big minority…but very loud obvious and obnoxious
        I think it’s going to backfire on them big time

        If nothing else, they are certainly solidifying the other base on it

        • Maybe. The older crowd. The younger crowd? Professional cuddlers. Bernie voters. Most college grads.

        • Latitude says:

          you know….not the kids I run into or hear about…while at the same time they all profess save the environment stuff….they are no on board with this safe space and global warming at all
          Their music, movies, everything about being a kid…is all shock and awe…total opposite of safe space

        • Hopefully. Maybe I just have too small a sample size. Or too concentrated. Remember, I fairly recently did 17yrs in Boston And NYC. And now have NAU, Flagstaff’s university, out here. California– would anyone be shocked if their state government started trying this?

          But also, just look at the overall trend in politics already: how many Conservatives are really Rinos? Look at the resistance to Trump, from his own party.

          Maybe I’m just pessimistic that we can really reverse that wave.

        • Latitude says:

          don’t get me started…LOL
          We have more liberals in the republican party than the democrats do!

  4. Latitude says:

    ..and then the news hides little tid bits like this one

    The report on NOKO having miniaturized a nuke…..was written in 2013
    …Obama and the democrats knew this and hid it from us

  5. Latitude says:

    Amazing what you can find on the back page of the news….

    Seems the Russian DNC hack was impossible……too much data was downloaded too fast to be a hack……had to be a inside leak

  6. The Democrats are typical leftist progressives. They project their bad deeds onto everyone else. This reminds me of a scene from the movie, “North by Northwest:”

    Leonard: Call it my woman’s intuition, if you will, but I’ve never trusted neatness. Neatness is always the result of deliberate planning.
    [And after shooting Vandamm with Eve’s gun–that is loaded with blanks]
    Leonard: It’s an old Gestapo trick. Shoot one of your own people to show that you’re not one of them. They’ve just freshened it up a bit with blank cartridges.

    So what if the Democrats made a deal with the Russians to take down Trump. As I’ve said before, this hacking the election nonsense is nonsense.

    Of course, it could just be a disgruntled Democrat insider too.


    • I meant this comment as a reply to Lat’s August 11, 2017 at 7:54 am comment.


      • Latitude says:

        got it…..Jim I think the dems had a leak…..might have involved Rich….I think there’s a lot more in those leaks than we know….
        The dems first said Russia hacked the dems…..then sucessfully turned it around and framed it the way the news is running wih it now…they knew they had the news in their pocket and the news would run with it

        Other than that…I agree 100%…who cares! and it’s impossible to hack our election, it’s not all wired up together….
        Notice no one is mentioning Obama hacking Merkel, Mexico, and Argentina, which is against the law

  7. Lars P. says:

    Hey, wanted to share this with you, it is one answer to global warming which summarise nicely several arguments:
    some highlights:
    “Funny how all the gauges show a 0.63mm/yr rise (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.””
    and look at those pictures 🙂 below

    temperature – this is a point I did not knew before:

    (This is a link to an auto-downloading compressed file of raw data. Heads up for seeing a file auto-download when you click it; I’m not trying to do anything to your machine) IS FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.

    … and a lot more. A nice summary as said…

  8. Lars P. says:

    Hey James, just a note: the gizmodo link does suppress the hyperlinks in the document that support the information provided in it.
    Here the original:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s