Snow, Ice, And Drake’s Passage!!!!!

As the lunatics fret about a hotting world, this is happening.


The creep towards Drake’s passage isn’t insignificant.  Indeed, it’s a third of the way there, and will probably be about half-way there before the Southern Hemisphere’s ice growth season has ended.

The orange line represents the supposed norm for the day the measurements were taken. 

Here’s how the SH sea ice extent looks on a graph ….


Graph is in millions sq/km.  Source


In the meantime, this is happening in North America over the same time period ….


Graph is in sq/km.  Source

So, the theory goes that the poles will warm the fastest, first, in a CO2 global warming notion.  The equatorial regions will not warm the fastest under the current theory.  And, yet, we have more sea ice in the SH and more snow in the NH.  Sounds about right …… if one is an idiotic warmist lunatic. 

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Snow, Ice, And Drake’s Passage!!!!!

  1. omanuel says:

    Nations and national academies of science were united in a giant, world-wide Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths on 24 Oct 1945 to prevent public knowledge of NEUTRON REPULSION – the source of energy in cores of galaxies, ordinary stars, some planets and all atoms heavier than ~150 amu (atomic mass units), including atoms of uranium and plutonium that vaporized Hiroshima and Nagasaki and drove leaders of nations and national academies of science into fear-based insanity (loss of contact with reality).

    They failed to heed Marie Curie’s sage advice: “Nothing is to be feared. It is to be understood.”

    NEUTRON REPULSION is the source of energy that powers the cosmos, the Sun and endowed us with “inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

    We are all products of a benevolent universe that selfish world leaders still cannot control or manipulate:

  2. gator69 says:

    You have to be a climate expert to understand this James. The poles are warming so fast, that we will not know how much they have warmed until at least a decade from now, or longer. Look how long it took the experts to figure out what the temperatures were in the 1930’s. It takes climate science a good deal of time to catch up with the data, it’s just not as simple as reading a thermometer.

    • suyts says:

      Well, yes, of course! Especially true in places where there are no actual thermometers!

    • Jim Masterson says:

      gator69 says:
      July 15, 2015 at 8:24 pm

      You have to be a climate expert to understand this James.

      “Climate expert” is an oxymoron.

      It takes climate science a good deal of time to catch up with the data, it’s just not as simple as reading a thermometer.

      Since they are manufacturing the temperature data, they don’t need “no stinking thermometers!!”


  3. Latitude says:

    OT rant….
    Just so I’m clear on the concept… can’t say this about muslims, jews, gays, women, blacks….not even liberals

    McCain: Trump ‘fired up the crazies’

  4. Lars P. says:

    Yep, there was also this at NTZ:
    “Ocean around Antarctica markedly colder since 2006…”

    which was a continuation of this:

    and yes:
    “the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) recently claimed that ice on the continent would grow over the coming decades as a result of global warming”

    btw just reminds me again of the other post, how they got rid of the ocean cooling, here the link again and let me start my rant about it:
    “I identified some new Argo floats that were giving bad data; they were too cool compared to other sources of data during the time period. It wasn’t a large number of floats, but the data were bad enough, so that when I tossed them, most of the cooling went away”

    so when too much cooling, just drop away the cooling extremes, this should help…. so convenient. But did he drop any warming extremes? No, not even checked if there are some, that cannot be…
    “But there was still a little bit, so I kept digging and digging.”
    lol. Based on the motto: dig and “improve” the data until it fits the preconcieved model…

    And of course the same “scietists” combine the “improved” satellite sea level altimeter over the old tide gauge without a second thought:
    “Rising sea level is one of the most serious consequences of global warming. In the past 50 years, sea level rose about 1.8 (plus or minus 0.3) millimeters a year. Satellite observations since 1993 indicate the pace has accelerated to about 3 millimeters per year.”

    They combine and adjust so long the measurements until it fits the theory. And they call it science… and we pay for it…
    If “the scientists” would compare satellite altimetry with tide gauges honestly, they would realise that there is a discrepancy between the 2 measurements and they would re-calibrate satellite altimetry to fit the tide gauges. then all their acceleration would disappear.
    But of course I do not hold my breath, adjustments “down” are never done and will never be done as long as the zealots run the show.
    Satellite altimetry was “calibrated” 2003 to show acceleration.
    They compare apples with pears show that the pears are longer and pretend that this confirms their theory, therefore they lost the right to be called scientists.
    rant end/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s