source for graph
So, we’re told that for over more than the last 50 years, we’ve had unabated global warming. The above graph represents some of the lunatics notion about our globe warming. Now, given the source, the lunacy the source has continued to express over the last several decades, I don’t believe the graph in any manner represents reality. But, even if it did, it wouldn’t mean what many people believe it means. An average global temperature doesn’t really mean anything. It is of no value nor meaning.
But, let’s take the lunatics at their word for a moment. The lunatics have stated this is what is happening to our global temperature. The lunatics have also stated that global warming harms crop production, and that we’re all going to starve because crop production is devastated by global warming.
Is that true? Is 55 years enough time to say whether or not it is true? I think a near lifetime of babbling idiocy is enough time to prove, through empirical evidence, that their idiocy is just that, and more; supreme, elegant, and complete and total idiocy.
If one believes the above graph, and studies such stupidity, and one also believes the assertion that crop production will/is decaying because of global warming, then, this is impossible ….
source for the graph, which is a lunatic UN bureaucracy.
A composite graph with all the different groupings of crop production (sans the one which overlap other food groupings) shows this production in tonnage of food ….
I simply don’t know the intellectual gymnastics one has to do to get around these two incongruent assertions. They are mutually exclusive.
If we’ve had global warming for the last several decades, then, global warming cannot cause major global crop production interruption, we have over 55 years of observation which demonstrates this.