Global Sea Ice Melt Down Demonstrated Since The Turn Of The Century!!!!



I made the graph as about as big as I can, and if you strain your eyes right, you might be able to see the ever so slight insignificant terrible loss of our sea ice extent.  Ohh the humanity!!!!!  A sure sign of the inevitable cycle of doom we’re in!!!!  Women and children to be saved first!!!!!! 

Here’s the last ten years, which has an imperceptible increase in our global sea ice.


How many proclamations of doom have we read discussing the loss of sea ice and albedo over the last ten years?  Well, they were FOS.  

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Global Sea Ice Melt Down Demonstrated Since The Turn Of The Century!!!!

  1. philjourdan says:

    Actually the last 10 are easier to discern the slope by the eye. But it is a catastrophe!

  2. leftinflagstaff says:

    And all the while, the CO2 increase is easily perceptible.

  3. DirkH says:

    2008 : Sarah Palin warns, if Obama gets elected, Putin might invade Ukraine.
    Quality media reaction at the time : “Hounshell wrote then that Palin’s comments were “strange” and “this is an extremely far-fetched scenario.””

    Looks like you missed the opportunity to elect a sage.

    • It’s not an invasion, those are simply peacekeeping troops. You know, like the soviets installed in East Germany to keep things nice & peaceful. Like the soviets installed in Poland. Like the soviets installed in Czechoslovakia. Like the soviets installed in Romania. & so forth.

      Gosh, it’s almost like you wingnuts don’t think that peacekeeping troops are really there for peacekeeping. What’s wrong with you? It has “peace” in the name!

    • cdquarles says:

      She’s wrong about one thing. The current government owned and operated ‘safety net’ does not exist because we want it. We, mostly, don’t want it. It was forced on us by elites who disliked the faith based, private system we had prior to the 20th Century ‘experiment’/’fetish’ of thinking that whatever social service the private civil society could do, the government could do better because it was ‘noble and altruistic’.

      • kim2ooo says:

        Yeppers! I agree.

        It’s amused me, no end, their hatred of anything of “faith” yet —- embrace the pseudoscience of Climate Change.

      • DirkH says:

        Behind the introduction of the “safety net” are the needs of industrialists. They are interested in having man and woman work in their factories full time while the state cares for the children, the weak and the elderly. A factory worker must appear every day at the same time, reliably; the need of the assembly line. Industrialists needed a whole different structure than the structure of traditional life. That’s also why they sponsored church bells everywhere – so that everybody in a city knew at any given time what time it was and whether to hurry to his shift.
        The “orphans” on the Orphan Trains were often children whose parents both worked in the factories of the East Coast industries, so there had to be found a way of getting rid of them, so they got shipped to the West and sold to farmers.

  4. tom0mason says:

    But all the ice must be melting or else why would Obama say:
    “You know, when I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, uh, you know — Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, you know, natural gas, you name it — whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, uh, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s