Uhmm, some people have a lot of explaining to do if this is true.
David D. Kirkpatrick, the NYT reporter who wrote the article on Benghazi which essentially blames the video and tries to insinuate that the attack wasn’t a bunch of jihadists Tweeted this during a discussion of the article.
@RichardGrenell we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable
David D. Kirkpatrick @ddknytHow’s that, again? The NY Times had a reported imbedded with a bunch of terrorists? And, are then going to try and claim this was a spontaneous event? Talking to the attackers while they were murdering our AMBASSADOR?!?!?!?!?
I don’t believe this for a second, but if it is true, there’s a whole bunch of explaining the NY Times has to do.
If it isn’t true, then this just once again demonstrates the LSM’s commitment to the truth. Well, it already does, either way.
h/t Twitchy
suyts space 
From the frying pan into the fire, Burns it burns. 😆
LOL, no doubt.
I guess tagging along with the 9-11-01 attackers would have made them extremely invaluable. Think of the newspaper sales!
PURE Horse Pockie!
BUT it will be fun to have him in front of Congress trying to back away or explain why they kept this silent.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Yeah, and the reporter was riding a white unicorn no less.
I got a picture of their embedded reporter! http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/n_tourist_guy.htm