Wow, just wow.
As we all know, GISS constantly fiddles with the historical data of our temps. Back in Feb, 2012 I wrote a post, basically laughing at the nutters about the lack of response to the diminishing ice in the Arctic.
In it, I used GISS data to laugh at the nutters. Today, I used a GISS graph to laugh at the nutters about tornadoes. …..
The first post had a GISS graph was from 2001.67 to the then most recent GISS data. Today’s post was from 2002 to the most recent. This is shown directly below. Again, today’s graph is directly below. For reference points, I drew a straight line to the vertical axis. The graph I used for the Feb post is below the first graph. Again, for reference I drew a straight line.
Assclowns. Yep, 2001-2010 was the hottest decade evuh!!! And, it’s still getting hotter!!!
Another observation. I should have drew lines for the bottom temp troughs. Although, those aren’t even needed! The cool part of 2008 has warmed by more than 0.05 C! As did the cool part of 2004!
But, look at the apexes! 2002, 2007, and 2010 all got noticeably warmer …… retroactively, of course. What new information has come to light for 2010 that we didn’t know in 2012? That people in 2004 didn’t know how to properly read a thermometer? We didn’t know this in Feb of 2012, but we do know this now?
Not that this graph tells us anything about the energy budget, it doesn’t. But, this is central to the open and abject dishonesty of the nutters. By their own metrics, I’m willing to bet that it would show significant cooling for the decade 2001-2010. But, we’ll never really know because they keep jacking up the real temp records. But, we’re suppose to believe them when they make declarations of hottest this ever or hottest that ever. Why should we? We absolutely know what ever they recorded at the time, it will change, and it will continue to change. Always.
And now they’re pretending to know what the OHC is? You wouldn’t believe the re-drawing of those values they done. Why? Because they lie, constantly. In their mind, the world is warming. Any data which conflicts with that view must be corrected. They’re doing the same with the satellite sea level data. Over and over and over again. Some of the nutters don’t even recognize their dishonesty. They simply believe so hard that the world is hotting up, that they know the data is in error when it conflicts with their world view and ideology. That’s why the HadCrut data had to be adjusted. That’s why the OHC data had to be adjusted, that’s why the Envisat, Jason I, and Jason II data has to be constantly adjusted. And, that’s why GISS data has to be constantly adjusted.
We will get 2.3 meters of sea level rise per degree C, and we will get the rise in temps, regardless of what our lying eyes are telling us.
Lastly, let’s take a moment to laugh at the lunatics who are trying to understand how much temp rise we should expect from additional atmospheric CO2 and how much sea level rise we should expect. Because the values of the *laugh, cough, laugh* empirical values constantly change, they’ll never be able to begin to think about properly modeling any of it. Consider the constant revision down of CO2 sensitivity, even with these artificially inflated values.
Nutters are to be mocked and not taken seriously.