Lies, Damn Lies, And Leftists — What Leftists Do When Reality Doesn’t Match Their Delusional World


We’ve had some recent events which demonstrate a pathology of the left.  They lie.  Worse, they lie with an intention to besmear people and groups of people who resist their ideology. 

Now, don’t get me wrong.  There’s not a person on earth who hasn’t departed from the truth.  People lie for many reasons…… to make themselves look good, to try to stay out of trouble, to profit from or scam people, etc….. However, the form of lying the left engages in, in a serial and pathological fashion is a bit more insidious than the reasons I listed.  If there ever was such a thing as a hate crime, this would be it.  They lie to vilify their ideological opponents. 

We’ve again have had recent events which demonstrate this. 

Recently there was a big hubbub at the University of Wyoming

The kerfuffle began on April 24 when an anonymous posting was made to a Facebook page called UW Crushes. The page, which has since been removed from Facebook, was a forum for students to confess their desires for each other in secret.

In it, there was this post……

“I want to hatef*ck Meg Lanker Simons so hard. That chick runs her liberal mouth all the time and doesn’t care who knows it. I think its so hot and makes me angry. One night with me and shes gonna be a good Republican b*tch.”

As you can imagine, this being on a university FB page and all, that the response was swift!  As all good university students do, because they’re too insecure about their own thoughts, they held a rally!

A rally in support of Lanker-Simons ensued with signs declaring that “rape threats are not a joke” and the like. Lanker-Simons spoke at the event and denounced the anonymous UW Crushes poster, according to local radio station KOWB.

One rally organizer, Amy Pauli, alleged that some kind of menacing “rape culture” plagues the University of Wyoming campus.

“It’s not just about the page. It’s about the way rape culture becomes fostered among students,” Paul told KOWB.

Megan Selheim, who is employed by the University of Wyoming as a STOP Violence Coordinator, egged on the protesters.

“I think sometimes we feel when we challenge rape culture, when we feel like we’ve been targeted, we feel alone and feel like we’re in the minority,” she said

And on and on it went.  But, guess what?  Police investigated! 

Police investigated the incident. By Monday, they had collected “substantial evidence” and determined that the posting was a hoax perpetrated by Lanker-Simons on her personal computer while it was in her possession.

Of course this isn’t an isolated incident.  And when leftist lunatics aren’t hoaxing bs to fool the media, the media just makes crap up. 

The most serial offender has to be MSNBC.  And they got caught again.  It was an odd one this time.  Apparently the administration isn’t pushing the gun agenda hard or fast enough for MSNBC.  So what did they do?

Friday MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts used selective clips from a speech by Vice President Joe Biden to make it look as though Biden was making a push for gun control. Biden’s speech had nothing to do with guns.

The speech was commemorating the four dead from Benghazi.  MSNBC is so serially dishonest that they couldn’t even rerun one of Biden’s clips which pushes gun control. 

Of course, climate warriors would be very familiar with this nonsense.  The most recent example is a discredited paper written by Lewandowsky and John Cook.  That paper will probably go down in the annals of history along side that nutter in Europe who wrote all of those invented papers, the one where trash make people racist and dozens of others.  Lewdy and Cook did just as bad.  They lied about the experiments, made up numbers, and drew their conclusions to fit their world view. 

These aren’t new events.  Idiotic citizens making crap up that gets seized by an uncritical media to advance their world view is all to familiar.

We remember Stripper Gate: Duke LaCrosse Case.  That’s Noose to Me: The Plagiarizing Prof Cries Racism, that’s where Professor Madonna Constantine supposedly found a noose on her office door, which she put there.  And who could forget Tawana Brawley
Of course no one could forget the case the helped Rev. Al Sharpton make his bones, in which 15 year-old Tawana Brawley was allegedly raped, smeared with feces and covered with racist slogans.  [All a hoax]  Chicago native Alicia Hardin, 19, an African American woman, was charged with a hate crime and disorderly conduct after confessing to sending three letters that contained racial slurs and threats against minority students at Trinity International University in Deerfield, Illinois.

And the list goes on.  But, as I said, when citizens aren’t making stuff up, the media will just manufacture lies, and then report them as truth.

Here’s just a few more examples from NBC…….

1. During last year’s presidential election, Andrea Mitchell was caught manufacturing a Romney gaffe where none existed.

2. During last year’s GOP primary, Ed Schultz edited video of Texas Governor Rick Perry to make him look racist.

3. In April of last year, the “Today Show” was caught editing audio of a 9-1-1 call to make George Zimmerman look racist.

4. In August of 2009, Contessa Brewer sliced and diced a photograph so it wouldn’t look like a black man attended a Tea Party carrying a firearm.  

5. Just this week, NBC News maliciously edited video of a town council meeting to make it look as though Second Amendment civil rights activists heckled a parent who lost his son in Newtown.

As far as the climate lies, well, I can’t even begin to list all of them.  Again, everyone has lied at some point in their life.  But, what we’re seeing here is a pathology.  And it presents itself with leftists.  It occurs when reality doesn’t match their world view.  It’s a form of immaturity, dishonesty, and intellectual vacancy, all rolled into one.  And that, my friends, is the definition of a leftist. 




This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

52 Responses to Lies, Damn Lies, And Leftists — What Leftists Do When Reality Doesn’t Match Their Delusional World

  1. Latitude says:

    How did you find all that??? LOL

    #4 doesn’t go to Brewer I don’t think….

    Loved it!!!

  2. Me says:

    Pretty much!

  3. Jim Masterson says:

    They should all be fired. Instead, they’ll get special awards for uninspired creativity.


  4. grumpydenier says:

    One good thing though, James, is you won’t run out of material once globule weirding is dead and buried. Maybe Nigel Farage has a relative who wants to live in America ;-).

    • HankH says:

      This from the Guardian…

      Many people who hate Nigel Farage the reactionary throwback find themselves liking Nigel Farage the chortling oaf. Being a chortling oaf not only makes you critically bulletproof – oafish chortling being a perpetual escape pod – it functions as a kind of cloaking device, somehow obscuring the notion that you’re a politician at all.

      Too funny! I’m not sure if we want any of his relatives or not.

      • suyts says:

        Farage, in my estimation isn’t much unlike Limbaugh, here. Except, Farage has more political sway. The UKIP is becoming a force to be reckoned with in the UK. Much of that is owed to Farage.

      • Me says:

        I like Nigel Farage, he seems to be the only voice in that circle over there calling a spade a spade.

      • grumpydenier says:

        There’s an old saying a friendly ‘uncle’ used to quote whilst trying to get me to sit on his knee;

        “It’s better the oaf you know than the one you don’t know who might just end up sitting in the Whitehouse”

    • HankH says:

      We could sure do with more people who aren’t constrained by political correctness. Farage isn’t afraid to call it like he sees it. That scores points in my book.

      • grumpydenier says:

        He’ll be in their crosshairs now and will take a few hits, no doubt, but as long as he takes some precautions they will only make him more appealing to the huddled masses.

  5. HankH says:

    There is a clinical term for the type of lying these ideologists do:

    Symptoms of Pseudologia Fantastica

    * The lies are believable and may have truthful elements. A compulsive liar is unlikely, for example, to lie about seeing a unicorn.

    * The lying continues for a long period of time and is not caused by some immediate pressure or stress.

    * The lies tend to present the liar in a positive light.

    * The lies have an internal [or ideological], rather than an external, motivation.

    Pseudologia fantastica is associated with borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, and histrionic personality disorder. It may also occur in the absence of any other mental health symptoms, as a result of trauma or due to nervous system malfunctions. People who grow up in environments where lying was necessary to gain approval are much more likely to become compulsive liars.

    • Jim Masterson says:

      HankH says:
      May 5, 2013 at 9:45 pm

      The lies are believable and may have truthful elements.

      Partial truths use to bother me. Now I just apply an old Yiddish proverb: “A half truth is a whole lie.”


    • suyts says:

      Just about right, Hank. Pseudologia Fantastica. That’s a leftist.

      • HankH says:

        I’ve always maintained that these leftists suffer from a socially acceptable form of insanity.

        • Jim Masterson says:

          I think leftists are brain damaged. Too much marijuana/Brussels sprouts during their formative years.


        • HankH says:

          Agreed. They’ve got synapses that just aren’t firing right.

      • suyts says:

        My dad and I used to have discussions about whether or not a neurosis could rise to a psychosis. Definitions mean things. Today, I’m not sure the psych world delineates as they once did.

      • HankH says:

        The psych world strains at gnats more than ever. They’ve expanded their nomenclature without expanding their knowledge.

  6. ThePhDScientist says:

    Is this similar to the hoax and lies you posted about the “forced lesbian kissing” by young school girls. Remember that post where you got all homophobic throwing out every gay slur in your small repertoire? Just another day in conservative fantasy land!!! Warming’s a false and everything is the “leftist” fault. HAHAHA!

    Contrary to a few media reports, female students were not forced to engage in any “lesbian kissing”.
    Contrary to a few media reports, male students were not told to carry condoms.
    Contrary to a few media reports, sexual activity among young adolescents was not condoned or promoted in any way.

    Click to access Important%20Facts.pdf

    • ThePhDScientist says:

      As I suspected this whole story was way overblown. What most likely happened is that one parent, with a similar mentality to many of the posters on this board, was angry that gay tolerance instead of Christian bigotry was being taught in school. They sold their fake story of forced lesbian kissing to the only news network with low enough journalistic standards willing to buy such bogus b.s. (that being the Christian News Network) and as always happens in today’s internet world a few other websites picked up and reprinted the overblown lies.


    • suyts says:

      LOL! Okay, so the school denies this….. so that’s proof. Christian bigotry? Yes, that’s exactly the thoughts that cause the left to perpetually lie.

      • ThePhDScientist says:

        Oh just admit the truth… In a moment of gay hysteria you ran with a fictitious story, which you thought would promote your misguided conservative view of the world – you know those gay activists are taking OVER and BRAINWASHING ARE CHILDREN!

        You took those minutes to show the world your true colors where you used eloquent terms such as “faggotry” and then you painted all gays and lesbians with the voyeuristic, perverted, scumbag brush. This post did Christians proud! And showed the rest of us what true Christian bigotry looks like!

        So congratulations and you’re wrong! AGAIN!!

        • philjourdan says:

          So you had only a “moment” of gay hysteria? I guess every time you visit here, you have those moments.

          Again, it was YOUR homophobic rantings. Everyone else was discussing the forced sexual encounter – and it could be any kind.

        • kim2ooo says:


          Ha ha ha ha, Seized … you outdo yourself.

          Is it any wonder no one believes you earned a PhD… especially in science?

          Balancing your homosexual leftist feelings with proof reading?

      • suyts says:

        Your paranoid delusions aren’t helpful. Try a dose of reality. Go back and read the post and demonstrate where I “painted all gays and lesbians with the voyeuristic, perverted, scumbag brush.”

        All you have to do is quote me. Here, I’ll help….. A quote from my post that you’re referencing….

        Before I go on, I want to make something very clear. While I can’t know how a homosexual would typically feel about this, I am assuming most would recoil and be outraged from this as the rest of us should be. I’m not ranting against homosexuality. That’s between them and God, as far as I’m concerned. I’ve no desire to worry about someone else’ bedroom habits. “

        Yep, sure seems like I painted all with the same brush there. Is your reading comprehension so poor that you need someone to read these things for you?

        Is this what it is that causes the left to lie so much? That reality doesn’t fit your world view and so you ignore reality?

        As far as my use of verbiage, I don’t adhere to the edicts of PC. If that offends you, then so be it. But, try to address reality while you rage against your imaginary foes.

        • ThePhDScientist says:

          You can’t say I’m not ranting against homosexuality and then use offensive terms. MAN HOW DUMB ARE YOU.

          I tried to explain it to you like twelve times.

          I’m not painting all Christians as homophobic but you’re a real bible-thumping, gay hating, priest-little boy loving, piece of shit. YEAH DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE, YET?

        • ThePhDScientist says:



        • ThePhDScientist says:

          Is it the fact that you’re of advanced age and living in echo chamber that you honestly can’t admit and see when you’re wrong?

        • suyts says:

          Offending people doesn’t make me wrong. It isn’t my purpose not to offend people.

        • suyts says:

          So, my descriptive verbiage is offensive to you. So what? That doesn’t make me homophobic. It makes me descriptive without regard to whether or not you’re offended. If you came here, not to be offended, then you came to the wrong place.

          A girl on girl kiss is homosexual, is it not? They were children, were they not? The adults were watching and instruction, were they not? So, that is, by it’s very definition, VOYEURISTIC PEDOPHILIA HOMOSEXUALITY. The “scumbag” part is simply my characterizing the jackasses that thought it appropriate.

          Ph, I’m truly sorry you take offense to the English language.

        • gator69 says:

          Hey PhD Cheerleader! Did your thesis have anything to do with homosexuality? It seems to be an obsession of yours.

        • philjourdan says:

          He is trying to “help” them the way liberals have “helped” the poor.

          With help like that, you do not need Margaret Sanger practicing her euthanasia.

    • philjourdan says:

      Um, care to repost a SINGLE slur? Actually, it is not a hoax. It happened. And the comments went more to “would they force a “heterosexual” kiss?

      The only homophobic rantings were yours. The resident homophobic racist bigot.

  7. gator69 says:

    Speaking of leftist liars, Gavin Schmidt gives quite a childish performance here. Note the half truths and whole lies, and of course the overall juvenile and unprofessional behavior.

  8. ThePhDScientist says:

    You’re an ideologue who can’t admit when he was caught being WRONG. Fess up to it. This was a make-believe story by the Christian News Network aimed to stir up homophobic feelings and gay hysteria.

    You and the rest of the gullible homophobes fell for it – hook, line, and sinker! Just proffer up your retraction.

    • suyts says:

      You have offered no proof that this was made up, and it was in fact, carried by more than CNS. And, the links that you have offered, by their verbiage, seem to indicate an admission that this event did, indeed occur. By your reasoning, because you didn’t like the way I worded my post, I should retract something……

    • suyts says:

      So, the mother quoting the child….. just invented?

      • ThePhDScientist says:

        Indeed she did! Who would we believe, a mother who’s supposedly quoting a child or the adults in the school. Well, we know you only believe the evidence you want to believe (see

        • philjourdan says:

          There are no adults in the schools. Zero tolerance = zero intelligence. The Adults have all left the building.

          Your logic is non-existent (but then I suppose you deny that ANY pedophilia exists in schools either – after all it is a child versus an older child with voting rights).

    • philjourdan says:

      The only homophobe here is you. So when are you going to offer your retraction?

      • ThePhDScientist says:

        Yes because I use the word faggot and refer to homosexuals as pedophiles. Please show me where I did that big boy?

        • philjourdan says:

          Never said you did. However, you have used countless other gay pejoratives in order to try to belittle us. With the only effect being to reveal your own homophobic, racist and misogynist bigotry. And I have more than once listed those vile pejoratives. If you are incapable of short term memory, that is indeed just another one of your sad handicaps. Lack of intelligence being the biggest one.

        • ThePhDScientist says:

          No big boy you’re just full of shit!

        • philjourdan says:

          More juvenile ad hominems and infantile pejoratives. Can’t debate the issue, so you try 5 year old name calling.

          You are no scientist. I am surprised you can spell the word given your lack of intellectual ability.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s