Men Who Confirmed The First Black Female Sec. of State Called Sexist and Racist!


More of the same from lunatic left with their unbelievable claims of whatever “ism” they wish to throw out against people who put country over gender and race. 

“It is a shame that anytime something goes wrong, they pick on women and minorities,” Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, the next chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told reporters Friday at a Capitol Hill news conference.

Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham earlier this week called Rice untrustworthy and unqualified to be the nation’s top diplomat if Obama chooses her to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The two vowed to block any Senate confirmation if she is nominated.

“To batter this woman because they don’t feel they have the ability to batter President Obama is something we the women are not going to stand by and watch,” said Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Wis. “Their feckless and reckless speculation is unworthy of their offices as senators.” 

Said Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C.: “We will not allow a brilliant public servant’s record to be mugged to cut off her consideration to be secretary of state.”

I’m not really sure what the argument is here.  It sounds like, because Susan Rice is female and black, we should expect either dishonesty or incompetence.  Personally, I find this attitude abhorrent.  On the weekend after the 9/11 attack on Benghazi, Susan Rice hit no less that 5 news/talk programs and loudly proclaimed information that was false.  It was clearly false when she made such proclamations.  So, she was either intentionally dishonest to the American people and the rest of the world, or she’s so incompetent that she can only parrot what someone else tells her to parrot with no discernment for the truth.   This would, in my estimation disqualify her for just about anything.  Or maybe, as the ladies above are saying, we’re suppose to simply accept this from Susan Rice, because she’s a female and a person of color. 

I think they’ve gone to the well too often for that. 

Read more: here.

This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Men Who Confirmed The First Black Female Sec. of State Called Sexist and Racist!

  1. miked1947 says:

    She is not competent to be SEC State. O’Bambi is not Competent to be POTUS either
    The Ladies speaking out show their incompetence to hold their elected positions.

  2. leftinbrooklyn says:

    Suddenly only white Republicans can be racist & woman-haters. And suddenly only female minority Dems can never lie or be incompetent. Some Co2-driven mutation in DNA?

    Or maybe their projection of the grip that race & gender has on their own thought processes has been allowed to bubble to the forefront. Naw, couldn’t be the latter.

  3. kim2ooo says:

    The House women vowed to fight any effort to make Rice a scapegoat for the explanations for the attack from the administration.

    [ My Bold ]

    Dear House Women,

    It isn’t RACE it’s RICE!

    Pull your big girl panties up and understand who made RICE the “scapegoat”.

    The White House sent her out to do the Sunday Shows. “She didn’t have anything to do with the Benghazi affair.” Obama. “She (Ambassador Rice) made an appearance at the request of the White House in which she gave her best understanding of the intelligence that had been provided to her. If Senator McCain and Senator Graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me.” -Obama.

    Why would Mr Obama choose someone, “who didn’t have anything to do with the Benghazi affair”?
    Why not The Secretary of State or the CIA director, DOD, or Panetta or somebody who did know?

    Mr Obama, chose Ms Rice for a reason and it wasn’t because she had any knowledge of the situation.
    Do you think, he [ Mr Obama ] just picked her out of a hat?
    Could it be, because of her stellar record as UN Ambassador?

    She’s missed almost as many meetings as Mr Obama has.

    That leaves 3 logical qualifications:
    An agenda stooge?
    A Woman?
    A person of Color?

    There are some higher-ups in this Administration that fit one or more of the above criteria – but none fit… all the above.

    I noticed, no word from you all about the chauvinist response Mr Obama gave “When they go after the U.N. ambassador apparently because they think she’s an easy target, then they’ve got a problem with me.” . Does she need the big strong man to come to her defense because a couple of Senators are criticizing her?

    Noticeably absent, in your criticisms, were mention of Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H – A woman.

    Question to Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, the next chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus: If a white woman. where elected to Congress, whose constituents were say 75% black and she tried to gain access into the Congressional Black Caucus to better represent them…would she be given membership?

    Hearn further reported that although the bylaws of the caucus do not make race a prerequisite for membership, former and current members of the caucus agreed that the group should remain “exclusively black”..

    Shouldn’t you lead by example?

    Might I suggest: Clean your own damned house before you instruct others.

  4. kim2ooo says:

    Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented:
    Please check spam bin

  5. kim2ooo says:

    One of those Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C.: “We will not allow a brilliant public servant’s record to be mugged to cut off her consideration to be secretary of state.” said.

    Ahhh you also said: “The tragic events in Benghazi point out the hazards of serving our country [and] go far beyond the military,” Holmes Norton said. “I agree with Mr. Chaffetz that perhaps had there been more resources, we might have had a different result.”
    “But I must note that while the Republican budget increases the budget of the Defense Department, it slashes the budget that would have protected these diplomats,” said Holmes-Norton.

    Issa: State Dept. sitting on $2 billion-plus for embassy security
    Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) says the State Department is sitting on $2.2 billion that should be spent on upgrading security at U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide, but the Obama administration will not spend the funds.

    This after:
    As reported today, Issa and Chaffetz sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning those attacks and related matters. The first known attack against the consulate occurred on Apr. 6, five months before the Sept. 11 attack.

    “Two Libyans who had been fired from a contractor providing unarmed static security for Consulate Benghazi, threw a small IED over the Consulate fence,” Issa and Chaffetz wrote in their letter to Clinton. “There were no casualties or damage and the suspects were arrested but not prosecuted.”

    Another attack occurred on June 6. “Under cover of darkness, assailants placed an IED on the north gate of Consulate Benghazi, blowing a hole in the security perimeter that was described by one individual as ‘big enough for forty men to go through.’”

    NO matter who you try to shift blame – 4 American Sons died on this Administrations watch!

    • suyts says:

      Exactly, and as we see, it wasn’t any Repub budget that prevented proper protection.

      • kim2ooo says:

        These Women and others trying to shift blame are, IMO, cowards.

        We know that AFTER Langley:

        An Unknown individual or group of individuals in the Obama administration decided to strip references to “Al Qaeda” or “terrorism” from the official talking points.

        Instead, the nation, the world, was systematically fed a line about a spontaneous radical reaction to an obscure anti-Islam film that had been posted on You Tube.

        And it was MS Rice who was used to promote this story. She had plenty of time AFTER her TV appearances, as facts became even better known, to correct the information, she didn’t.

        Mr David Petraeus’ testimony raises even greater concerns about the Obama administration’s handling of the disaster in Benghazi.

        The question that must be answered; Why were the talking points changed – and who changed them?

  6. Bruce says:

    I thought the first black female Secretary of State was sexy and racy. I still do. Which means I’m obviously a sexyist and a racyist, or in other words, male.

    Unfortunately, post Benghazi, I can say no positive nor even printable thing regarding Ms Susan Rice. Which by progressive definition means I must be a misogynist.

  7. gator69 says:

    This is all part of a strategy. Placing women and minorities in these positions makes their agendas unassailable, as any criticism will be colored as racist or misogynistic.

  8. philjourdan says:

    Newspeak – if you DO NOT hold a minority to a different standard, you are a racist.

    • cdquarles says:

      Not quite. I remember what they did to Justice Clarence Thomas and Sec. of State Condoleeza Rice. (I remember the bombing of the 16th St. Baptist Church. The building still has visible damage from it. I have never met her, but I know people who knew her and her family as well as family members who were killed that day (they are dying off one by one). One of the best days that I can remember from Bush 43’s administration is seeing Sec State Rice sitting in Bryant-Denny Stadium with a bigwig from Britain watching the Crimson Tide play football. (Ala – Fla? argh I am getting old)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s