Did Dante have a spot for politicians who babble inanities because someone told him something about something? I mean, good grief, some of the crap he spewed has long since been debunked. But, there he is, up on a stage simply parroting some alarmist tripe. Good, we’re more than ready for an open honest discussion on this. The facts and data are on the skeptics side by an overwhelming margin. Here’s what Zero had to say about this….
We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.
I’ll tell you what betrays our children and future generations…….. running up a debt so high that they can’t possibly pay it down, nor have a reserve for when a real threat occurs.
Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But American cannot resist this transition. We must lead it.
Ahh, arguing the imaginary consensus. This has been thoroughly debunked. But, then, so has the “more powerful storms” meme. The number of forest fires was down remarkably last year and the acreage could be substantially less if Zero had bothered to fund the air fleet for fire fighting. Droughts are less severe and have less duration than the past.
We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries. We must claim its promise. That’s how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure, our forests and waterways, our crop lands and snow capped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That’s what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.
Yeh, that would be some fine words, if we were actually pursuing new technologies and creating new industries, but, that’s simply fiction. Our forests, waterways and crop lands are fine as well as our snow capped peaks. Heck, our yields on crops have been exponentially increasing! Our waterways? In the 30+ years of doom and gloom have we lost any rivers? I didn’t think so.
It is interesting to watch how Barry uses God for his purposes.
“November 22, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – For the fourth year straight, President Obama has omitted any direct statement thanking God in his Thanksgiving address.”
Giving thanks is not reason enough to invoke the Almighty
“That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God.”
But when Barry can use God for his agenda, he is suddenly religious.
“It’s said that the Twitter messages actually thumbed by President Barack Obama @BarackObama are signed `BO.’
The one this morning came from St. John’s, the church across Lafayette Park from the White House, where the first family went this morning on the chilly and overcast day of the public inauguration ceremonies:
“I’m honored and grateful that we have a chance to finish what we started. Our work begins today. Let’s go. -bo”
The president and his family arrived at St. John’s at 8:35 am EST.
The service ended at 9:39.
BO tweeted at 9:25.”
http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2013-01-21/obama-tweets-from-church-lets-go/
It’s all about Barry. God is just a prop.
He’s Tweeting during church services …… nice. Class act that guy is.
I think he looked at it as tweeting during an attention deficit crisis.
Well his new pastor sounds very like his old pastor. Cringeworthy.
The report suggests this happened at the same service, but I suspect it was a previous Sunday as the names don’t match. Nonetheless, he has a quite clear preference for a certain type of place of worship.
Tweets give Barry plausible deniability, when questioned about his “pastor’s” political sermons later.
Yeh, maybe that’s why he never heard Wright damning the US, he was Tweeting before there was a Twitter!
HEY, CAN ANYONE IDENTIFY THE TWO BOOKS THAT HE SWORE IN WITH?
I’m right in the middle of something, but I think I can run that down for you if someone doesn’t do it first! I recall seeing a headline about it somewhere. Just guessing I’d say a Bible and a Koran.
And, mom, when you type in all caps, it’s like yelling. In this case, it’s okay to yell, just a heads up!
Love you!
Oops, apparently I was wrong. Two Bibles, one once owned by Lincoln and the other Martin Luther King Jr. You can click on the link to take you to the article……
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/10/obama-to-use-2-bibles-when-takes-oath-office/
One at least was a Bible from Lincoln’s inauguration, as there was a news report about it yesterday. It is a bit battered, but they have a protective box for it.
CSM says yes, and that the other is Martin Luther King jr’s Bible.
I can’t fault those two choices. Perhaps he might read one or the other.
Yeh, reading one or the other would be cooler than swearing on them!
Beat me to it Suyts! You type quicker than me. The link failed to the CSM article but since you have one to Fox already I won’t bother.
“Yeh, reading one or the other would be cooler than swearing on them!”
Do they make a teleprompter bible?
Yes, but that wouldn’t help him learn anything. Humility, President Obama, you need some humility. You don’t know it all, and much of what you do know just isn’t so.
Obama needs a crises to revoke more liberties. As such, he will contort anything to be a crises so he can.
That being said, the basic premise of the MSM and the liberal sycophants is inherently wrong. They see anyone who CAN spout the liberal mantra as being a genius. It is evident to even the most casual observer that Obama cannot think on his feet (a true indication of intelligence), but he is good at rote memorization.
While that is not a good thing (the media should be telling us the truth, not protecting their demi-gods), knowing that allows the average person to be one up on both the media and liberals. By simply watching what others say about their demi-gods, you can determine the level of intelligence of the commentator, and thus the level of information they are capable of providing. Using this test, it is quite clear why the Internet took off. The people purported to be the purveyors of information are found to be desperately lacking, and the thirst for knowledge by man is insatiable. So he found a better venue – one not impeded by the low intelligence of the old media.