The Left’s Refusal To Learn

image

Breitbart has an interesting article out today.  It’s about the disastrous “cash for clunkers” program president Zero touted. 

I won’t rehash all of the arguments against this massive bit of stupidity, I’ll just point out some things many of us said was going to happen in regards to this program before it happened.   Much of it is detailed by the various links Breitbart provides.

“Cash for Clunkers” taxpayer-funded boondoggle artificially drove car prices up, not down, and unleashed an “environmental nightmare”

For each ton of metal recovered by a shredding facility, roughly 500 pounds of shredder residue are produced, meaning about 3 to 4.5 million tons of shredder residue is sent to landfills every year. This shredder residue typically consists of a mix of materials including polyurethane foams, polymers, metal oxides, glass and dirt.

While some of the “Clunkers” were truly old, many of the almost 700,000 cars were still in perfectly good condition. In fact, many that qualified for the program were relatively “young,” with fuel efficiencies that rivaled newer cars.

Approximately 45 percent of the spending went to consumers who would have purchased a new vehicle anyway. Our results suggest no gain in sales beyond 2009 and hence no meaningful stimulus to the economy. In addition, the program will reduce CO2 emissions by only 9 to 28.4 million tons, implying a cost per ton ranging from $91 to $288 even after accounting for reduced criteria pollutants

The fact is, the program didn’t do what the alleged intentions were.  It was suppose to help clean the environment and stimulate the economy.  It didn’t.  Worse, it severely hampered the used car industry, forcing many used car businesses to close their doors.  Worse yet, the economic detriment was focused on the poor of this nation.  Where once they could spend a couple of $thousand for a decent used car, the program forced the price of used cars beyond the reach of our poor, losing their ability to seek and maintain a job, causing even more poverty. 

The point is this.  We said all of this was going to happen.  It was plainly stated in the blogs, in the opinion pieces, and even on the air.  All of it.  Now, years later some are acknowledging we were right.  Small consolation.  But, it’s much worse than that.  Now some are saying we were right, but, in the future will this be considered?  Of course not.  This will be dismissed without reservations.  And, they’ll continue with their vapid thoughts and continue to implement their stupidity as policy.

We see this manifested in everything said and done today.  While we were the first to say this will needlessly adversely effect the poor, we are cast as being indifferent to the poor.  While we said this will cause environmental harm, we’re dismissed as being the ones who recklessly harm the environment.  We told them this wouldn’t sustain an economic benefit, our thoughts on economic good is sneered at and completely ignored, all the while we continuously demonstrate much more advanced understanding of the issues at hand. 

They simply refuse to accept reality.  They simply refuse to learn.  

About these ads
This entry was posted in Climate, Economics. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Left’s Refusal To Learn

  1. kelly liddle says:

    Well in Australia we had a plan for such a scheme which got shelved soon after your scheme started if my memory serves me correctly. Lucky we were a bit slow, on this one anyway.

  2. DaveG says:

    I’m sick to death of the lefts stupid/costly programs that always hurts the economy. Stand by for more mind boggling stupidity from Zero in 1 2 3….

  3. kim2ooo says:

    H/t gator69 says:
    January 7, 2013 at 10:47 pm

    Trees killing 22,000 Europeans annually!

    “Poplar, willow or eucalyptus trees, all used as fast-growing sources of renewable wood fuel, emit high levels of the chemical isoprene as they grow, the study said. Isoprene forms toxic ozone when mixed with other air pollutants in sunlight…. Ozone can cause lung problems and is blamed for killing about 22,000 people a year in Europe.”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2258441/Trees-grown-biofuel-worsen-air-pollution-kill-1-400-people-year-2020-study-shows-blow-green-energy-sector.html#ixzz2HInufAjI

    • cdquarles says:

      The terpenes released by plants don’t need ‘other air pollutants’ to create ground level ozone. You only need sunlight and the VOC isoprene and the thousands of other terpenes that get emitted. Keep in mind we still are ignoring ethylene in this discussion, which nearly every fruiting plant emits when fruit ripens and is also emitted in response to ‘heat stress’, locally lowering air temperatures in the canopy as well as, via the photochemical reaction mentioned previously, creates ground level ozone on sunny days. Indeed, where I live, on a warm, sunny day, you can smell both the terpenes (pine wood smell or Pine Sol smell :) ) and the ozone in the air even though there are no cars or other people for 10s of miles.

    • suyts says:

      Have a post on that just up!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s