Recent Polls…… Why??? How??? Simples

 

Any cogent person, not just in the U.S. but around much of the world have seen something like this…. (Click on the pics for links to the articles.)

image

 

image

Obama is ahead on some polls…. but wait, here’s Rasmussen Romney is ahead!!!

 

image

So, what’s going on?  Are the other’s lying?  Well, we can rule out Fox lying for Obama.  So, is Rasmussen wrong?  Probably not.  They’ve a great track record with polling.  So, how can it be that after being caught lying, violating campaign laws, running on perverse notions such as he’s an advocate of coal, and an economy still going nowhere that Obama could possibly be up in any of the polls?  Have the American people simply rejected Romney out-of-hand?  No, nothing of the sort. Here’s what it happening which is throwing the polling out of whack.

image

This is just the way it is.  Our athletes’ performance on the world stage makes us feel good about ourselves and our nation.  As the leader of our country, president Obama reaps some of the benefits of this ‘feel good’ notion.  No, this isn’t very rational, but it is the way us Americans are.  I guarantee that if the team U.S.A. was in the 3rd or 4th spot or lower, Obama’s poll numbers would be significantly lower.  In spite of America’s obvious decline in some areas, our being number one in this allows us to project this to other facets of our society.  See, we’re the best!  Just look at the Olympics!  In fact, I feel a bit dirty and unpatriotic by my missing some of the Olympics.  It’s just the way it is.

None of this will last beyond 3 days of the closing ceremony.  But, for right now, the American people’s attention has stopped on the politics and have united under the common cause of rooting for our team U.S.A.  This is how, and this is why, Obama can be seen as up in many of the polls.  Again, this isn’t lasting.  It just is for right now. 

About these ads
This entry was posted in News and politics, Sports. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Recent Polls…… Why??? How??? Simples

  1. It’s probably the difference between polling “likely voters” and “registered voters”. Rasmussen talks to likely voters. There will be registered voters that won’t vote.

    • suyts says:

      Yeh, well, like the post says, all of this is skewed by the Olympics anyway. I think once they’re over and much of the political shenanigans are understood, Obama will likely be in trouble across the spectrum.

      • His problem is the last four years. People see who he is. He can’t change that. No hope and change happened. The only change was for the worse.

        How about them wars in Egypt and Libya. A friend of mine knows lots of left liberals in San Francisco. He was with one of them the day after Obama unilaterally started the war in Libya. He said the guy said the most vulgar things. He couldn’t believe his ears. The man was so high on Obama and Libya changed all that. The guy felt betrayed. He lost that guys vote and everyone else like him. They’re registered to vote but they won’t voting.

      • suyts says:

        Well, right, when Obama became president, one of the few things I wished Obama would accomplish would be to end some of our entanglements abroad, and to curtail the authority of the Patriot act. He increased both. :( No right and proper pacifist can possibly vote for Obama. Of course, I’m no pacifist, but I saw our involvement in Libya and Egypt, and now Syria, as entirely unnecessary.

  2. gator69 says:

    There is also the VP issue. Who Romney picks will say alot about both Romney and the Republican party. Of course, just knowing it won’t be Joe Biden, should be enough to ease most folks minds…

  3. kelly liddle says:

    I had a Texan Rancher (I am guessing that is what you would call a cattleman) in my cab yesterday and of course I had to ask him some questions. He was here because there was some conference on the type of cattle he has and our agricultural show is on at the moment. One thing that struck me was he said all those collecting gov cheques will probably vote Obama. So more people recieving welfare of one sort or another are more likely to re-elect the incumbant. He also seemed quite annoyed that you have not had a federal budget for 4 years and no one will cut anything referring to both parties.

    This reminds me a little of how my mum used to speak saying if people on welfare ever become the majority you are doomed because they will always vote to recieve welfare.

    So there is method in the madness put everyone on welfare and you can remain king until the big collapse comes.

    • suyts says:

      That’s about right. And, no politician in their right mind would move to significantly cut anything because they’re immediately be crucified by political opponents and the media. It is the ultimate end. The only solution is to be ready for the collapse and make it a quick as possible.

      • DirkH says:

        Basically that’s how the Greek voted themselves into oblivion. Ironically in Germany it was the socialist Schröder who cut the long term unemployment benefits – very similar to Clinton’s workfare reform. Clinton was prodded by Gingrich to do it; Schröder had to do it to fullfil the “Maastricht requirements”, the EU’s rule that the deficit of a Euro country must stay under 3%. And ironically, in that case the strange nondemocratic archaic rulemaking of the EU worked.

  4. Gallup shows a bad number for approval:

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx

    Can you say “President Romney” boys and girls? I knew that you could.

  5. suyts says:

    Well, yes, many will be disappointed. But, it will be instructive to many. Although the LSM tries to paint Obama as a centrist, there’s no hiding from the fact that he’s a socialist. And, one can make the case that he puts ideology ahead of country. Obama has stated as much. But, if this is that obvious to you and me, how much more would it be to a person who believed race would be a priority to Obama?

    Look at what’s happened already. Gay marriage? Yeh, the NAACP has endorsed it. I’ve never met a person of color who has. Bowing to other heads of state? Show me a person of color who thinks the president of the United States, especially being of color, should bow to the king of Saudi or the Emperor of Japan. And, so much more……. I think the words I hear when I bring these things up are, “Oh, HELL NO!!!”

    But, maybe that’s just the company I keep. Disappointed? They are already.

  6. Pingback: Told Ya So!!! Polls Moving In Romney’s Direction | suyts space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s